EXPLAINABLE SECURITY REVIEW
Check an EVM Wallet for Observable Risk Signals
WalletGenome summarizes public, observable risk indicators and shows the factors behind its score instead of presenting an unexplained safety verdict.
What the analysis covers
Explainable risk factors
Inspect the recorded contribution of approval, failure-rate, stale-approval, and unknown-contract heuristics.
Blacklist status
Keep non-behavioral blacklist checks distinct from behavioral scoring, including explicit unavailable states.
Worst-chain summary
Use the highest supported-chain risk score as the aggregate headline when the underlying history is complete.
Useful for
- Reviewing visible warning signs before interacting with an address
- Finding which supported chain contributes the highest observed risk
- Identifying factors that deserve manual investigation
Important limits
- A score is not proof that a wallet is safe, malicious, or controlled by a particular person.
- Definitive risk conclusions are withheld when required provider history is incomplete.
- The scanner does not detect every exploit, compromise, or off-chain threat.
Frequently asked questions
Can a wallet risk checker prove that an address is safe?
No. It can surface observable on-chain warning signs, but it cannot prove safety or predict every compromise.
How is the WalletGenome risk score calculated?
The score combines documented factors such as risky approvals, failed transaction ratio, stale approvals, and interaction with unknown contracts. The methodology page lists the current rules.
What happens when wallet history is incomplete?
WalletGenome labels the affected datasets and withholds definitive risk conclusions instead of interpreting missing records as clean activity.