EXPLAINABLE SECURITY REVIEW
Screen an EVM Wallet for Observable Security Signals
Use WalletGenome to review the configured factors behind an address’s risk score without turning a heuristic into a safety verdict. The tool is read-only and does not trade or submit transactions.
A score is a screening signal, not proof of safety, compromise, malicious intent, or ownership.
What the analysis covers
Explainable risk factors
Inspect the recorded contribution of approval, failure-rate, stale-approval, and unknown-contract heuristics.
Data completeness
See when the risk headline is withheld because required wallet history is partial or unavailable instead of treating missing records as clean activity.
Worst-chain summary
Use the highest supported-chain risk score as the aggregate headline when the underlying history is complete.
Useful for
- Reviewing visible warning signs before interacting with an address
- Finding which supported chain contributes the highest observed risk
- Identifying factors that deserve manual investigation
Important limits
- A score is not proof that a wallet is safe, malicious, or controlled by a particular person.
- Definitive risk conclusions are withheld when required provider history is incomplete.
- The scanner does not detect every exploit, compromise, or off-chain threat.
Frequently asked questions
Can a wallet risk checker prove that an address is safe?
No. It can surface observable on-chain warning signs, but it cannot prove safety or predict every compromise.
Which factors can affect the risk score?
The score combines documented factors such as observed high-risk approvals, failed transaction ratio, stale approvals, and unidentified contract interactions. The methodology page lists the current rules.
What happens when wallet history is incomplete?
WalletGenome labels the affected datasets and withholds definitive risk conclusions instead of interpreting missing records as clean activity.